Skip to content

Conversation

breskeby
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 9.1:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

@breskeby breskeby requested a review from a team as a code owner August 29, 2025 14:42
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 29, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs:

🔔 The preview site may take up to 3 minutes to finish building. These links will become live once it completes.

…lastic#133708)

* Update distro packaging when testing java ea versions

* Unify resolving pre release java versions like RCs and EAs

This reworks how we deal with pre-release java versions for testing.

Passing `-Druntime.java=25-pre` will pick the lastest build that could be either an EA
or and RC version.

Passing explicitly a build number works by running build via
`-Druntime.java=25-pre -Druntime.java.build=36` which as of now would pick a RC build.

This also tweaks the archive packaging in case of a defined pre release version. This is
used downstream when packaging serverless images including ea / rc versions

* Bring back getJavaDetails used when configuring fips

* Adopt ReproduceInfoPrinter

(cherry picked from commit 5e71f1a)
@breskeby breskeby force-pushed the backport/9.1/pr-133708 branch from 5485da5 to 3d8363c Compare September 3, 2025 17:23
@breskeby breskeby added the auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) label Sep 3, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 1e553de into elastic:9.1 Sep 3, 2025
35 checks passed
@breskeby breskeby deleted the backport/9.1/pr-133708 branch September 3, 2025 22:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport v9.1.4

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants